[packages/openssl102: 432/432] - cloned from openssl branch v1.0.2 as openssl102 to make it parallel-installable with current 1.1.1

[Elan Ruusamäe]

commit 9fc1b1b87b259e8a327c99835865e91a391efc9e
Date: Sat Sep 29 00:55:56 2018 +0200
- cloned from openssl branch v1.0.2 as openssl102 to make it parallel-installable with current 1.1.1 and newer
openssl-man-namespace.patch | 6 +-
openssl.spec => openssl102.spec | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/openssl.spec b/openssl102.spec

why not just update Name on openssl package branch?

altho i prefer just to keep same package multiple versions installed:


# rpm -q openssl
openssl-1.0.2o-1.x86_64
openssl-1.1.1-1.x86_64

[Jacek Konieczny]

Post by Elan Ruusamäe
# rpm -q openssl
openssl-1.0.2o-1.x86_64
openssl-1.1.1-1.x86_64

This does not work well with upgrades (e.g. „upgrade *” in poldek gives
„multiple versions installed”). IMHO separate package with own name is
much cleaner.

For me it does not matter much if it is build from a different branch of
the same spec or from a separate repo, but as branches is how we do it
with kernel or php, then I guess it is the way to go.


Jacek